Alex Bogusky on Why Learning from Failure Creates Cultures of Fear
This isn’t necessarily all that competitive intelligence related but it was such a major point of rethinking for me, it inspired my first blog post in months! Here’s an excerpt from the original FastCompany post:
It’s become a classic business mantra: you learn more from your failures than from your successes. But what if that idea is all wrong? Alex Bogusky, co-chairman of Crispin Porter + Bogusky, believes it is–and recent MIT research showing that we learn more from success backs him up. “You create a fearful culture where you spend a lot of time looking at where you screwed up,” he says. Instead, his company has bred a culture in which success is celebrated, and failure is forgotten.
Popularity: 2% [?]
The Electric Company is a Genuinely Funky Show
Popularity: 9% [?]
First Windows 7 Commercial from Microsoft – My Little Pony Meets PowerPoint
Popularity: 13% [?]
Intellipedia, Discoverability & the Gov 2.0 Movement Toward Living Intelligence
I stumbled across this YouTube video from a link on Twitter and found it a pretty cogent argument selling the benefits of Intellipedia as driving quality of the work product as more important than the standard collaboration hype that so often seems to be the tone of most media coverage of the national intelligence sharing project. One of the more interesting observations by the video’s author, Chris Rasmussen, a social-software knowledge manager at the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, is that any Enterprise 2.0 project must replace a legacy process or risk failure. Here are his notes on the video:
Intellipedia is now in its fourth year and the dominate view of its role can aptly be described as “good for collaboration but not the product.” Each intelligence agency still vets and generates “their” products and Intellipedia is largely viewed as an adjunct of generic information compared to the official process. The living intelligence model aims to reduce parallel product creation by moving the review process into the same place where the collaboration takes place. This would create a central and transparent vetting system that replaces legacy processes. This is a key lesson for all Enterprise 2.0 endeavors–it must replace something. Living intelligence has also been referred to as purple intelligence.
Rasmussen also links to an article earlier this summer in Federal Computer Review where he discusses the purple intel concept and which asks “Is ‘discoverability’ the answer to the information breakdowns that have hampered homeland security efforts?”:
[Rasmussen] … prefers to call himself a purple intelligence and mashup evangelist, pointing to the fact that purple is the color that results from mixing multiple points of the spectrum.
Purple is an apt symbol for combining the expertise of organizations working to help prevent future attacks, he said.
Rasmussen has seen purple power in action through countless little success stories accomplished via Intellipedia, the information-sharing wiki that serves intelligence agencies, the military and the State Department. “All the time, people are connecting with others [who] they didn’t know worked on the same issue six feet down the hall,” he said.
Connecting the dots, more formally known as information discoverability, is gaining increasing attention from homeland security officials and experts in their ongoing attempt to corral anti-terrorism information that resides across federal, state and local jurisdictions.
In January, the departing director of national intelligence issued Intelligence Community Directive 501, which gave intelligence personnel a “responsibility to discover” information believed to be relevant to their work, along with a corresponding “responsibility to request” information they have discovered.
The directive defined discovery as the act of obtaining knowledge of the existence, but not necessarily the content, of information collected or analysis produced by any intelligence community element.
Two months later, the bipartisan Markle Foundation published a report that reaffirmed “discoverability” as the first step in any effective information-sharing system.
“Solving discoverability simplifies solving information sharing,” said Jeff Jonas, an IBM distinguished engineer and a member of the Markle Task Force on National Security in the Information Age.
But despite these high-profile mandates, challenges call into question the feasibility of discovery tools and techniques for solving data-sharing problems that span agencies, jurisdictions and cultural boundaries. Some say the technology isn’t even the hard part.
The real issue for Intelligence 2.0 then is not whether intelligence teams can collaborate more effectively but whether the methods can make a difference in the quality of the work product?
What do you think?
Popularity: 15% [?]
Michael Moore New Movie Trailer for “Capitalism: A Love Story”
Michael Moore’s new movie ironically might generate more vitriol by conservatives against Obama than by progressives against Bush, as intended, but I guess we’ll find out on or about October 2.
Popularity: 10% [?]
Japanese Band SOUR Webcam Music Video
I know I’m late to the party in seeing this, but it’s cool.
Popularity: 11% [?]
He’s Barack Obama & He’s Come to Save the Day – JibJab’s Funny New Music Video
Since China, Russia, India, Europe and Japan no longer seem to have much appetite for U.S. government debt and “Quantitative Easing” being forced on the Federal Reserve by the Treasury to pay for the out-of-control budget deficit without the political hazards of raising interest rates, I found this new video from JibJab pretty timely… and hilarious!
Popularity: 10% [?]
The Onion News Network Video of What It’s Like to Take Your Toddler to Work … if You’re a Congressman
Congressman’s Son Won’t Shut The Hell Up During Hearing
Popularity: 9% [?]
Is Microsoft Finally Denting Apple’s Mac Armor?
According to this article at FastCompany.com, “data released by BrandIndex reveals that ad lab Crispin Porter + Bogusky has finally helped Microsoft turn the corner, and that Apple may need to rethink its derisive response to Microsoft’s new “Laptop Hunter” ads.” Judging from the Apple ad above, I’d say they’ve got their attention; it comes off a little more defensive than usual to me. Here’s another quote from FC:
A BrandIndex survey of 5,000 people shows that among the 18-to-34 year-old demographic (that’s right, young people) Apple’s “value perception” has taken a nose-dive. BrandIndex rates a brand on a scale of -100 to 100 (zero meaning the brand is getting equal positive and negative feedback) by simply asking customers whether they feel they get a good value for their money. Apple enjoyed a value rating of 70 as recently as last winter but has plunged to 12.4 since then. Microsoft, meanwhile, has rebounded from an indifferent zero in February to 46.2 today, indicating that its latest attempt to portray Apple as overpriced is hitting home with customers.
Popularity: 6% [?]
7 Minute Abs from There’s Something About Mary – Inspired by #SCIP09
After spending last week at SCIP09 in Chicago, I was reminded of how competitive intelligence people in corporate roles are often confronted by the same sort of executive myopia we see in this infamous scene from the Farrelly brothers’ classic “There’s Something About Mary“.
The lead character, Ted (Ben Stiller) picks up a hitchhiker (Harland Williams) who explains his breakthrough idea designed to reshape the landscape of the personal fitness industry by improving an existing competitor’s value proposition in a way that makes the current offer obsolete – “7 Minute Abs“… enjoy:
What struck me funny was, if you transpose the hitchhiker as CEO and Ted as CI practioner, you get some valuable takeaways for how not to manage the function… or maybe companies should just start by not picking up hitchhikers and making them CEO.
Popularity: 6% [?]
Connect on LinkedIn